Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
1.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 25(3): 672-686, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-620478

ABSTRACT

The impact of COVID-19 has challenged the long accepted 'norm' in delivery of psychological therapy. Public policies designed to reduce transmission have made it extremely difficult to meet with service-users safely in the traditional face-to-face context. E-therapies have existed in theory and practice since technological progress has made them possible. They can offer a host of advantages over face-to-face equivalents, including improved access, greater flexibility for service-users and professionals, and cost savings. However, despite the emerging evidence and anticipated positive value, implementation has been slower than anticipated. Concerns have been raised by service-users, clinicians, and public health organisations, identifying significant barriers to the wide spread use of e-therapies. In the current climate, many clinicians are offering e-therapies for the first time, without prior arrangement or training, as the only viable option to continue to support their clients. This paper offers a clinically relevant review of the e-therapies literature, including effectiveness and acceptability dilemmas and challenges that need to be addressed to support the safe use and growth of e-therapies in psychology services. Further research is needed to better understand what might be lost and what gained in comparison to face-to-face therapy, and for which client groups and settings it might be most effective.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Psychiatry , Psychology , Telemedicine , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , Pandemics , Psychotherapy, Group , SARS-CoV-2 , Telephone , Treatment Outcome , Videoconferencing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL